LST Alliance / Live Secure Trade – Master Exposure of a Pig-Butchering Crypto Investment Network

LST Alliance, also operating under the name Live Secure Trade, represents a clear example of a modern pig-butchering crypto investment scheme. The operation has repeatedly changed domain names, rotated identities, and shifted trading platforms while maintaining the same underlying structure: long-term trust building, guided trading, escalating deposits, and systematic withdrawal obstruction.

This master article documents how the LST Alliance network operates, the platforms it uses, the individuals it presents, and why its structure is fundamentally incompatible with legitimate investment activity.

What Is a Pig-Butchering Investment Scheme?

Pig-butchering is a form of long-con investment fraud where victims are “fattened” over time through relationship building, education, or mentorship before being financially exploited.

Key characteristics include:

• long trust-building phases
• authority figures or mentors
• controlled trading platforms
• steady profit displays
• encouragement to add more capital
• withdrawal denial once balances grow

LST Alliance follows this model precisely.

---

Identity Shifting and Domain Rotation

LST Alliance has operated under multiple domains, including:

• lstgroup.site
• lst-ic.com
• lst-inc.org

Frequent domain changes are not accidental. This tactic is used to:

• avoid accumulating complaints
• escape consumer warnings
• reset online reputation
• fragment evidence across platforms

Legitimate financial firms do not need to abandon domains to continue operating.

Authority Framing: Professors and Administrators

A core trust mechanism within LST Alliance is the use of named authority figures, including:

• Charles Bennett – presented as a “Professor”
• Kevin Thomas – presented as a “Professor”
• Sophia Larsen – acting as administrator and daily coordinator

These roles are designed to simulate an academic or institutional environment. The “professor” title implies expertise and legitimacy, while administrators maintain engagement and compliance.

No independently verifiable professional credentials, regulatory records, or public affiliations have been provided to substantiate these identities.

Trading Platform Dependency: IPX Exchange & IPXN Max

Participants were directed to conduct all trading through IPX Exchange, with an associated trading application reportedly named IPXN Max.

The platform displayed:

• account balances
• transaction history
• consistent profit growth

However:

• users did not control private keys
• funds could not be withdrawn freely
• balances existed only within the platform’s interface

This indicates a custodial, platform-controlled ledger, not real market settlement.

In pig-butchering schemes, the trading platform is not the market — it is the cage.

The Standard Operational Timeline

Across reported cases, the LST Alliance network followed a consistent sequence:

1. recruitment through private groups or messaging
2. introduction to “professors” and structured learning
3. guided or signal-based trading
4. visible profit accumulation
5. encouragement to increase capital
6. withdrawal requests delayed or blocked
7. new conditions introduced
8. funds permanently locked

This progression is intentional and engineered.

Withdrawal Obstruction as the Endgame

The defining moment in every pig-butchering scheme is withdrawal denial.

With LST Alliance, users reported:

• partial withdrawals allowed early (to build trust)
• withdrawal restrictions once balances became meaningful
• explanations involving rules, verification, or internal requirements
• no clear path to full fund recovery

Legitimate platforms do not retroactively invent conditions for withdrawal.

---

Why “Education” Is Used as Cover

By framing itself as Live Secure Trade and presenting an “academy-like” structure, LST Alliance avoids immediate classification as an investment service.

This allows the operation to:

• bypass regulatory scrutiny
• shift responsibility onto the user
• blur the line between learning and investing

Education is used as a shield, not a service.

Transparency and Regulatory Absence

LST Alliance does not disclose:

• a registered legal entity
• regulatory licensing
• jurisdiction of operation
• accountable management

Combined with rotating domains and platform control, this creates a zero-accountability environment.

Why This Network Is High-Risk by Design

The risk associated with LST Alliance is not accidental or operational — it is structural.

Every component:

• rotating domains
• authority figures
• proprietary platforms
• profit dashboards
• withdrawal restrictions

is designed to maximize deposits while preventing exits.

ForteClaim Master Risk Assessment

Based on ForteClaim’s investigative framework, LST Alliance / Live Secure Trade qualifies as:

• a pig-butchering crypto investment network
• operating through identity fragmentation
• using controlled trading platforms
• relying on authority impersonation
• designed to block withdrawals permanently

Final Verdict

LST Alliance / Live Secure Trade is not a legitimate investment or trading operation.
Its structure, behavior, and platform mechanics align precisely with known pig-butchering crypto fraud networks.

Risk Level: Extreme
ForteClaim Status: Master-Flagged Network